Newsflash

AGM 25th March

See Home

 

Planning Process

What's happened so far?

  • Banks Developments submitted a planning application for the erection of the wind monitoring mast
  • Crewe and Nantwich Borough Council rejected the application
  • Banks Developments appealed against the Council's decision, citing a different location from that identified in the original planning application. The Planning Inspector ruled that the appeal had to be based on the original site location (Banks Developments later agreed that they had made an error)
  • The Planning Inspector overturned the Council's decision
  • Banks Developments erected the wind monitoring mast in the wrong location
  • The Council enforcement officer requested Banks Developments to erect the wind monitoring mast in the correct location
  • Banks Development agreed that they had made another error, dismantled the mast/rigging and erected it in the correct location at the end of January 2009

What will happen next?

The planning process is complex, and made more complex by the fact that decisions made by Cheshire East, The Planning Inspectorate and possibly the Courts may create several branches in the process.

We anticipate that the next stages of the process will be:

  1. The wind monitoring mast collects data about wind patterns in the Bickerton area for a period of between 3 and 12 months. "Best practice" is usually 12 months, however, we anticipate that the developer will cut this period short
  2. The developer submits a "screening report" to Cheshire East. The screening report states how the developer will proceed with the planning application; this is dependent on the size of the proposed industrial wind power station
  3. The developer submits a "scoping report" to Cheshire East. The scoping opinion describes what issues must be addressed by the developer in the Environmental Statement (ES)
  4. The developer submits the planning application for the industrial wind power station together with the ES to Cheshire East
  5. The Cheshire East planning officers review the planning application and make their recommendations to the Development Committee
  6. Members of the Cheshire East Development Control Committee consider the application and either approve or reject it
  7. If they reject the application, the developer will appeal
  8. An inspector is appointed to adjudicate and sets up a public enquiry
  9. The inspector will either uphold the developer's appeal or uphold the Councillors' original decision
  10. If the inspector supports the developer's appeal, there may be a judicial review

We will be taking advice from both our planning consultant and Cheshire East about the process and the above list of actions may, as a consequence, be updated as new information is received.

How will the planning decisions be made?

For a gentle introduction to this topic, read Country Guardian's paper titled "Wind farms and the planning system". Click here.

This paper refers to Planning Policy Statement 22 (PPS22) and other documents which set out policies for renewable energy and which planning authorities should have regard to when preparing local development documents and when taking planning decisions.

This publication was issued by the former department, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) while John Prescott was the Deputy Prime Minister.

For further information ...

... please click on


Planning Policy Statement 22: Renewable Energy


Planning for Renewable Energy: A Companion Guide to PPS22

 


Quotes & Articles:

"A windfarm is not the answer"
Paul Kingsnorth, The Guardian, 31st July, 2009

"Wind power is a complete disaster"
Michael Trebilcock, National Post Canada, April 8th, 2009

"Wind farms risk becoming 'redundant symbols' warns CPRE"
Louise Grey, Environment Correspondent, The Telegraph, 24th July, 2009

".. wind represents an illusory technology — a cul-de-sac that will prove uneconomic and a waste of resources in the battle against climate change."
Professor Jack Steinberger, Director of the CERN particle physics laboratory in Geneva and a Nobel prize-winnner, The Times, May 27th 2009

"How can wind turbines generate so much lunacy?"
Christopher Booker, The Sunday Telegraph, 19th July, 2009

"... turbines are a political slap in the face of the landscape"
Simon Jenkins, The Guardian, Thursday 16th July 2009

"When wind power blows, jobs will fall"
Dominic Lawson, The Sunday Times, 19th July 2009

"Renewable Energy Strategy is Inconsistent and Implausible"
Dr John Constable, The Renewable Energy Foundation,15th July, 2009
Copyright © 2010 Stop Bickerton Wind Turbines. Disclaimer - All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.