Newsflash

AGM 25th March

See Home

 

Industrial Wind Power Stations

The phrase "wind farm" is a somewhat romantic title often used by the promoters of wind energy to describe what is really an "industrial wind power station".

Many articles have been written in recent years about wind power and more will be published in the coming months. Many of these articles are written or commissioned by large organisations who develop or operate wind power stations. Not surprisingly, in view of the huge profits made by such projects, these organisations tend to exaggerate the benefits of wind power stations and play down the negative aspects. Experience has shown that every claim made by wind power station developers needs to be analysed carefully and challenged to ensure that the true facts are presented.

For a developer's eye view of the steps involved in developing a wind farm, take a look at the commercial wind farming guide produced by the East England Development Agency.

In the UK, there are several organisations which set out to present a more accurate account of the pros and cons of wind power including "Country Guardian" and the "Renewable Energy Foundation". If you can spare a few minutes to visit their websites, you'll find a lot of useful information about wind power.

Dr John Etherington has written a series of very helpful "papers" for Country Guardian. See the link in the previous paragraph. The papers include links to other articles if you need more information and his book "The Wind Farm Scam" provides an up to the minute view of these topics.

Intermittency and "wind collapse"

The biggest problem with industrial wind power stations is that the power they generate is intermittent, unpredictable and unreliable.

Turbines will not work if the wind is not  strong enough, while if it is too strong the generators have to be locked down to avoid damage. In a speech in the House of Lords on 7 May, Lord Reay claimed an idleness rate for turbines of between 55 and 110 days a year.

There is now data available which shows that the frequency of total wind collapse across the UK is higher than generally understood and that these low wind situations are often across the whole of Europe at the same time.

For example, between October 2008 and February 2009 there were 58 days when turbine output across the whole of the UK would have dropped below 5% of the rated capacity and and on 24 of these days, output would have remained below 5% all day.

What this means is that wind power cannot be relied on at times of peak demand and that they require to be totally backed-up (a fact still contested by some!).   

Read more at When the wind stops

And take a look at what Scottish Power, one of the major supporters of wind energy, has to say about back up - click here.

As ever, the wind industry is working hard to play down the intermittency problem and we expect to see a series of reports commissioned by them. We also expect a series of robust responses from more objective sources.

Power Generated

The power generated by an on-shore wind turbine is likely to be between 25% and 30% of its rated capacity. Assuming the former figure, a turbine rated at 2MW (Megawatts) on average throughout the year will generate only 500KW (Kilowatts). To put this in perspective, this is equivalent to the maximum power output of about seven family saloon cars!

Developers often try to exaggerate the power output of wind turbines by quoting how many local homes will be supplied.

Take a look at 'Homes supplied by a windfarm'or read "The Wind Farm Scam" for an up to the minute review of this topic.

CO2 Savings

In previous years, developers exaggerated the CO2 savings attributable to wind power stations by a factor of 2 until they were challenged. Much to their embarrassment they now have to use a much lower figure and this figure will decline again in 2010 as more efficient conventional power stations come on line.

Read more at 'Calculating CO2 emissions and savings' or read "The Wind Farm Scam" for an up to the minute review of this topic.

Economics

If we assume that the developers propose three 2.3 MW turbines, they can expect to generate an income of approximately £35 million over the 25 year life of the wind power station. From this they will of course have to deduct expenses such as the cost of the turbines, civil works, loan interest, insurance, maintenance etc, however, the outcome for them is like to be an accumulated profit in the region of £9 million over this period.

Technical Aspects

For more information click here or read "The Wind Farm Scam".

 


Quotes & Articles:

"A windfarm is not the answer"
Paul Kingsnorth, The Guardian, 31st July, 2009

"Wind power is a complete disaster"
Michael Trebilcock, National Post Canada, April 8th, 2009

"Wind farms risk becoming 'redundant symbols' warns CPRE"
Louise Grey, Environment Correspondent, The Telegraph, 24th July, 2009

".. wind represents an illusory technology — a cul-de-sac that will prove uneconomic and a waste of resources in the battle against climate change."
Professor Jack Steinberger, Director of the CERN particle physics laboratory in Geneva and a Nobel prize-winnner, The Times, May 27th 2009

"How can wind turbines generate so much lunacy?"
Christopher Booker, The Sunday Telegraph, 19th July, 2009

"... turbines are a political slap in the face of the landscape"
Simon Jenkins, The Guardian, Thursday 16th July 2009

"When wind power blows, jobs will fall"
Dominic Lawson, The Sunday Times, 19th July 2009

"Renewable Energy Strategy is Inconsistent and Implausible"
Dr John Constable, The Renewable Energy Foundation,15th July, 2009
Copyright © 2010 Stop Bickerton Wind Turbines. Disclaimer - All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.